On September 23rd and 24th Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center hosted an Internet Safety Technical Task Force (ISTTF) open meeting, where 15 companies made presentations on technological solutions intended to help make the Internet safer for America’s youth. The Internet Safety Technical Task Force, you recall, was created in February 2008 by the Attorneys General Multi-State Working Group on Social Networking and MySpace.
Anyone following the public meetings should be interested in icouldbe.org’s recently published news story about their participation. Frankly, icouldbe.org’s presentation was the only one by a company fully committed to providing an absolutely safe environment for youth on the Internet. In fact, their existence depends on it. We’re grateful to have them as a partner on the development of Trufina’s Child Protection Suite.
The most informative presentation at the meeting might have been the one given by a few of the youth representing Teenangels.org, which is part of WiredSafety.org Teenangels is a group of 13-18 year-old volunteers that have been specially trained by the local law enforcement, and many other leading safety experts in all aspects of online safety, privacy, and security. The teenangels research indicated that children and youth feel that their biggest online threat was from cyberbullying, and that the most effective means for limiting cyberbullying would be to provide tools to identify offenders, to kick the
‘bad actors” off the hosting community sites, and to ban them thereafter. So if the technology companies were listening, the keys are:
- Apparent anonymity needs to be accompanied by tools to hold offenders responsible. The teenangels specified tools for identity verification, not just age specific verification, so that offenders can be identified.
-The identity tools need to allow the hosting website to remove the offenders quickly, and to ban them permanently. So the tools must prove uniqueness.
As in daily life, cyberbullying is perpetrated by a minority of the community. Once children and youth realize that they will be banned permanently from participation, their behavior will improve, or they will not be allowed to play in the digital playground created by the hosting community sites.
Not coincidentally, the tools for limiting cyberbullying are similar to the ones that should be used for keeping predatory adults from interacting with children. And guess what, the combination of anonymity through the use of pseudonyms, coupled with identity verification by a hosting web site, would provide the same benefit of cleaning up adult behavior on forums and blogs Internet wide. Is it possible that improved behavior by adults might influence the behavior of our youth?
